Friday, 19 July 2013

Vale Bob Howard


Yesterday I buried my father. That might seem to have nothing to do with sport (and it  doesn't) but this is also a personal blog so I'm publishing here what I said at his memorial service. 


I wanted to say a few words today on behalf of Bob’s children – myself, my sister Sara and my brother Dominic.

Let me start by saying thank you to everyone for coming today. Bob always enjoyed a gathering of family and friends and this is one party he would have loved to be at. 

When we put the notice in the paper about today, we specifically called it a celebration of dad’s life. Bob was never a fan of teary funerals so we hope that today you will remember all the laughs you shared with our dad over the years.

Of course dad would not really approve of anyone crying over his passing.  I can’t really recall too many times when he allowed himself to cry.  Perhaps whenever Geelong lost a Grand Final.  He came from a generation of Aussie males who lived through World War 2 and all the hardships that went with it. Bob and his contemporaries were used to bearing up under difficult circumstances, not tearing up.

My wife Kellie often jokes about the Howard trait of not talking much about emotions and I guess we learnt that from dad. Yet there is a vast difference between not talking about emotions and not having them.

I grew to appreciate the sacrifices dad had made for his kids much more once I had children of my own.  I made a point therefore of telling dad that I loved him whenever I saw him in recent years.  It seemed to surprise him every time.  Not because he didn’t feel the same way, but I think because to him it was a given that he loved his family and he felt it didn’t need to be said.  Certainly based on all he did for us and how he doted on us, none of us ever doubted his affection.

He showed his love in many different ways. 

Some of you may know that Bob was one of the worst backseat drivers in the history of the world. He used to hate being a passenger in any car because, he said, Australia has the worst drivers in the world.  After I got my license, I am quite certain he felt the standard had actually lowered significantly.

Bob would sit, whiteknuckled in the front seat, giving helpful instructions to whichever one of us had the dubious honour of chauffeuring him around. On one famous occasion when Dom was driving him somewhere, Bob screamed ‘look out’ so loudly that Dom slammed on the brakes in anticipation of a massive collision. As the car shuddered to a halt, a tiny potato chip packet floated harmlessly across the path of the car.  Nonetheless, Bob remained convinced he had helped avoid a major incident.

Yet despite his terror at being driven around by anyone else, Bob still volunteered to teach all of us as teenagers how to drive.  He wanted us all to be safe on the roads.  He wanted to protect his children.

Another way Bob showed his love for his children was in his intense pride in our achievements. I remember how over the moon he was when Sara told him she had made the Editorial Committee for the Monash Uni Law Review.  Not only was his daughter going to become a lawyer – every parent’s dream – but she was also combining it with experience in his field of expertise. I don’t think I have ever seen him so proud.

If I did, it would have been when Dominic got his tryout with the Melbourne Football Club. Bob was forever showing me clippings about Dom’s footy career but the prospect of his son being that close to playing for an AFL team was something he clearly relished.

Bob also clearly showed his pride in my own sporting efforts in no uncertain terms, chasing down photos and video footage of me competing through his connections in the sporting media.

And what great connections he had too. He seemed to know everyone around town and had such amazing stories to tell. Who amongst us can say we’ve toured the country with a member of the royal family? 

One of Bob’s great qualities, and it is probably was why he was successful as a journalist, was his ability to tell a good story.  Unfortunately it is a character trait that wasn’t passed on to me, but I will share with you one of Bob’s favourite stories from his time touring the country with Prince Philip.

The Prince was a qualified pilot and, as Bob told the story, used to delight in landing the small plane that he, his entourage and the travelling media were using to fly around outback Australia. 

It was the Prince’s ritual after successfully touching down to open the door of the cockpit and give the thumbs up to Bob and the other passengers, to which he invariably got a rousing round of applause.

On one occasion however the Prince’s landing was anything but smooth, with the plane hitting the deck so hard that luggage flew everywhere and the passengers thought that they’d been in a crash.

The Prince flung the door open with a big grin and gave his customary thumbs up but, instead of applause he received a chorus of load groans.  At this – and here you will have to forgive my very bad impersonation of Bob impersonating the Prince – the Duke of Edinburgh said “Sorry about that chaps”.

Invariably after telling that story, Dad would let out a roar of laughter and repeat “sorry about that chaps” a couple more times.  I never grew tired of hearing him tell it. I wish he was here now to do that story justice one more time.

Bob’s sense of humour was certainly one of his best features. He loved to laugh and passed that trait on to the rest of our family. Humour has always been used as a way of showing affection in our family and, the more you love someone, the more you tease them. While that is hard for some to understand, it’s what brought us together as a family.

Dad used to get his fair share of stick from the rest of us too. 

He took great pride in his appearance, shaving fastidiously every single day and even up until his passing was regularly the best turned-out resident at Karana – always appearing at meals in a tie and jacket. However at home with us when we were kids, his choice of fashionable was questionable to say the least.  We used to love teasing him about what we called his “deckchair shorts”. They were casual shorts which due to their garish striped pattern looked as if they had been cut from the cloth normally seen only on deck chairs on British beaches. 

Bob held onto these hideous shorts for years, much to our dismay, and seemed to wear them virtually every day on our summer holidays. Probably because he enjoyed the constant jokes about them as much as we did.

We also loved to tease him about his height – or lack of it.  Given my brother and I are both over six foot and dad was most definitely not, the standard joke was that we must have had a tall milkman back in Germany.  He used to feign outrage before laughing along with us.

Dad’s army story about a commando course he helped run quickly morphed into a standard family joke about him being the world’s shortest commando.  We imagined him not having to duck down to crawl under barbed wire or to avoid enemy fire.

Bob knew that we were very much laughing with him and his willingness to laugh at himself is a lesson which he taught us all.

But his family weren’t the only ones who enjoyed dad’s sense of humour.

When we were cleaning out Bob’s apartment on the weekend, I came across a large farewell card given to dad when he retired by his colleagues. Virtually every comment on the card mentioned his sense of humour.

Two comments that I particularly thought reflected Bob and are perhaps relevant today were as follows:

“We will miss that wicked laugh, the glint in the eye, the punting tips, the tie dangling out of the pocket in the mornings and above all your fantastic sense of humour.”

And this, from his friend Lin, who went to the effort of composing an “Ode to Dobbie”:

“An era ends, it’s sad to say
When Dobbie Howard leaves today;
That wicked wit, that lethal charm –
He’s always ready with open arms
To help his colleagues when in doubt,
With headings, names, ideas for a rout.
We’ll miss his smile, his little ways
But hope to see him in town on Fridays.”

And I have no doubt that they did indeed see dad for a few Friday drinks over the years as well.

At this point it’s probably worth addressing one of the images you will be seeing of Bob on the big screen. It is a caricature of him holding a top hat in one hand and a drink in the other given to him upon his retirement. We all thought it appalling, but Bob absolutely adored it so we felt bound to include it today.

I’ve been thinking a lot about what I’ll remember most about dad.  

As a young kid, I used to love riding on his shoulders. He used to joke that it was the weight of me up there along with his walking far earlier than other children that had worn down his legs and made him so short.

I’ll remember sitting next to him as he howled with laughter watching his favourite TV shows – usually British comedies with people like Sid James and Benny Hill.  I must admit, I heard the Benny Hill theme song in my head when I used to think of him trying to charm the nurses at Karana.

I’ll always remember Saturday afternoons in Autumn and Winter listening to the footy on the radio with him in the back yard or traveling with him to see Geelong play.  The trips down to Kardinia Park were always special.  The jokes he’d make about a road called Droop Street we’d always drive past on the way out of Melbourne. More jokes about the smells from the sewerage farm outside Werribee. Standing next to him on the terraces at Kardinia Park. Walking to the Lord of the Isles pub after the game to endlessly rehash who played well and who didn’t. Then the long trip home in the dark which would be over too soon.

But perhaps my most vivid memory of him will always be the tenderness he showed his wife, our mum, on the day she passed away.  Stroking her hair and talking to her gently even though she was unconscious as she lay in the hospital.  That memory came flooding back to me recently as I sat doing the same for him on the night before he died.

When we met with Bev, our celebrant, to talk about today, she asked Sara and I “what would Bob have said about his life”?  I’m not even sure what I said at the time as I hadn’t really thought about it but, on reflection, I think if Bob would have been in the room he would have said this.

He would have started by offering Bev a drink. Probably a glass of his favourite ‘bubbles’. He always liked to make guests feel welcome and he was never one to leave anyone’s glass dry.

Then he would have laughed at getting out on cricket’s ‘devil’s number’ of 87 (or 13 years before 100).

He also would have said he’d liked to have seen a couple more premierships for Geelong.

Finally he would have said he had a good life, had a lot of laughs, met some great friends and had a family that loved him.  He’d wish he was here today to have a drink with you all and share some stories about all the good times. He’d also ask that all of you think of him with a big grin on his face the next time you raise a glass in celebration.  I know I certainly will.

We’ll miss you dad but we’ll always love you.

Thank you.


Tuesday, 2 July 2013

Bevo a tough act to follow

Pop quiz.  Can you name the guy who started at shooting guard for the Chicago Bulls the season after Michael Jordan retired (either the first or second times)?

If you can .... gold star and an elephant stamp for you, but the point is that not too many folks remember the guy who comes after a legend.

That is the quandary that newly announced Perth Wildcats head coach Trevor Gleeson finds himself in as he tries to lace up the boots formerly filled by predecessor Rob Beveridge.

Beveridge made it clear after missing out on the Australian Boomers national team gig to the man that had denied him the NBL title for three straight years, Andrej Lemanis of the NZ Breakers, that he was seeking a new challenge.

“I had a dream and a vision that I publicly stated from day dot that I want to be the head coach of the Boomers,” Beveridge said when announcing his departure from Perth.

“Unfortunately, I didn’t get the Boomers job, and over the last six weeks in particular, it was ‘OK, what am I striving to do in my life?’

“I have had some great opportunities in the past to coach internationally, and it’s something that I need to tick a box.

“I believe that now is the right (time) to go and pursue those international opportunities.”

So Beveridge departed the Wildcats, leaving behind an amazing legacy of success.

In his four seasons with Perth 'Bevo' led the team to the Grand Final three times, including delivering the proud club its first championship since 2000.  Beveridge's 'worst' performance was a Semi-Final berth in 2010/11 where the 'Cats lost in the maximum three games to eventual champions New Zealand. That was of course despite losing marquee star Shawn Redhage to a season-ending injury.

For a franchise accustomed to being part of the post-season, Bevo had ensured that the Wildcats were nothing less than leading contenders in every year of his tenure. It is no wonder then that the flame-haired coach is hugely popular in Perth. So much so that the announcement of Gleeson as his replacement was met with a level of animosity amongst certain quarters. 

Yet Gleeson is no rookie head coach. He has a wealth of experience in both the NBL and internationally and a Coach of the Year award sitting snugly on his mantlepiece. 

Gleeson took Townsville to five consecutive playoff appearances during his time with the Crocs.  After joining the Melbourne Tigers for the 2011/12 season he also had his new club at the top of the NBL ladder before the departure of superstar Patty Mills and a series of injuries saw the Tigers stumble. The fallout of that slump ultimately led to Gleeson being shown the door by team management, leading to a small blemish on what has otherwise been an immaculate coaching record. 

Despite having the stigma of being a coach that got punted mid-season, it is a measure of the respect with which Gleeson is regarded around the league that he snared the NBL's most prized coaching gig in Perth.

He joins the league's most successful team, playing in the country's newest arena for an owner in Jack Bendat who will ensure that Gleeson can recruit the players he wants to the full extent of the salary cap. 

That last factor will be important, as the Wildcats need to find two quality imports and two key Australian players to finalise their roster for the new season.

Could Gleeson's dream job in Perth however actually turn into a nightmare?

With the coach's clipboard in Perth also comes the weight of expectation. This is after all a team that has made the post-season in each of the past 27 seasons. On-court success isn't just a hope for the members of the Red Army; they consider it their birthright. The coach that presides over the team that eventually breaks that string of playoff appearances is likely to be chased all the way back across the Nullarbor Plain by a very angry mob.

Does that mean Gleeson will be that unfortunate coach? Of course not, but he wouldn't be human if the manner of his departure from the Tigers didn't play on his mind somewhat. Coaching is just as much a confidence game as playing and Gleeson will need to push the memory of his firing in Melbourne to the back of his mind and try to ignore the heavy expectations that will hang over his head like the sword of Damocles in Perth.

Yankee Stadium was renowned as the house Babe Ruth built but for many people out West the Wildcats' have been filling their new home at Perth Arena due in a large part to the success which Beveridge brought to the proud franchise. Whilst the vision and cojones of club Managing Director Nick Marvin arguably had just as much to do with it, there is no doubt that Bevo's presence will continue to be felt in Perth Arena long after he's left town.

No one remembers the guy who comes after the legend. So Gleeson better make darn sure he writes his own glorious chapter in Wildcats history. 

Sunday, 10 February 2013

Expansion on my mind


A recent article in the Townsville Bulletin quoted NBL legend and current Townsville Crocodiles General Manager Pat Reidy as saying that he believed the league should ultimately be a 10-team competition.

"I would like to see the league get to 10 teams and just sit back and work on the product for a while rather than rushing into any expansion," Reidy said.

"Getting to 10 teams, playing each other three times with a good 30 game season and then really work on the product.

"I think that's a good round number to sit on for a while and see what the future holds."

Interestingly however the man he replaced at the helm of the Crocs, former CEO Ian Smythe, advocates a far more cautious approach to expansion.

“The league is not ready for expansion yet beyond Brisbane, the league as a whole needs to be humming to expand,” Smythe tweeted recently.

Which raises the question of just when and where the NBL should expand?

Basketball Australia sent a clear signal that they would not be rushed into expansion when they recently rejected a formal bid for a second Melbourne team.  Given Melbourne was one of two priority markets that BA has previously identified publicly, that rejection came as a surprise to many.

Yet the bid group simply hadn’t secured the financial backing necessary to convince the BA Board that it was a long-term proposition. 

BA CEO Kristina Keneally made it clear that if anyone was going to get a new license, they would need to show that they had the sort of business plan to ensure they would be around for the long haul.

"In the past we've seen clubs fail to survive. There's not a big margin there," Keneally said in an interview with AAP.

"I would rather say no to an expansion that might give us a year or two of excitement, but ultimately would disappoint fans and other clubs.

"Expansion is critical to the future of the NBL ... but it requires a team to have a sustainable financial model."

Whilst major metro markets are what BA has publicly said they will focus on, Board member Andrew Gaze makes it clear that he believes the NBL shouldn’t just be looking to the bigger markets for future teams.



"Brisbane. Another team in Melbourne ... certainly Sydney you would expect could be able to sustain two teams," Gaze told AAP.

"But ... places like Newcastle, Geelong, Hobart (could field teams). Those areas that have had past experiences in the NBL.

"If the model is right and the formula is right, then I don't know why there can't be teams in those areas as well.

"There's certainly been enough evidence to say cities and towns of that size can support a team.

"Those towns have got tremendous passion and the regional teams usually get great exposure - look what happened in Cairns and Townsville."

Whilst Gaze makes a valuable point in the argument about expansion by pointing to there being a pre-established fan base in former NBL markets like Newcastle, Geelong and Hobart, he also ignores one inconvenient truth.  That is that all of those markets have already failed to sustain their NBL teams, which is why they no longer have one.

For that matter, the two anointed priority expansion markets for the NBL – Brisbane and a second Melbourne team – have also previously hosted failed franchises. 

Expansion back into Brisbane is however a no-brainer.  It is the third largest city in Australia and has a population almost twice the size of Adelaide.  It has a huge potential viewership market which can significantly boost NBL audience figures for its broadcast partners, and is also home to an increasing number of corporate headquarters for major companies which could be potential sponsors.

Adding Brisbane back into the mix gives the NBL a truly national footprint once again, so it is going to happen. 

It’s also understandable that Melbourne is high on the agenda.  Victoria has by far the highest number of registered basketball players of any state in Australia and is a perennial powerhouse at national championships of all levels.

Yet it is worth remembering that no state has had more failed NBL teams than Victoria. 

The traditional argument for a second Victorian team is that Melbourne needs a second club as a large percentage of the basketball community simply refuse to support the Melbourne Tigers because they play against them at the junior level.  Yet no one team has managed to successfully enter the Melbourne market and stay the course, which must undermine the prevailing logic that the Victorian capital – as the acknowledged basketball capital of Australia – can support a second Melbourne club.

There are those that will argue that the last ‘other’ Melbourne team – the South Dragons – were a success.  After all, they did win the NBL title in their final season, averaged better crowds than the Tigers and weren’t forced out of the league due to financial problems like most of their predecessors, but instead chose to exit.

Yet the Dragons had publicly stated that they had regularly run at a financial loss.  They relied on the deep pockets of their ownership group to keep operating.  If they had been profitable in their title-winning season you could be fairly confident that they would have reversed their principled stance and chosen to remain in the league.

So no one has yet found the magic formula for a successful second Melbourne team. Does that mean it doesn’t exist? Of course not, but ultimately it doesn’t matter. 

Basketball Australia is committed to a second Melbourne team, just as they are committed to a new Brisbane franchise.  The good news is that Keneally, Gaze and co. won’t fast-track license applications towards that goal, but instead are committed to the less popular course of waiting until the right business models are presented with the right financial backing. 

That may not be music to the ears of Brisbane Bullets fans eager to see their team back in the league, but it is absolutely the right approach if you want the new clubs to have the best possible chance of long-term success off the court.

Whilst we know the two markets that BA are focusing their attentions on, things don’t always go to plan.  If they did, the NBL would already be back to a 10-team league with Brisbane and a second Melbourne team in the fold.  Ultimately, any and all license applications will be considered on their merits by the BA Board. 

Which raises the question of just where will the next new NBL franchises come from?  I run the ruler over all the cities so far thrown up as possible locations of new NBL teams and rank them in the order that I would admit them to the league, as well as assessing the likelihood they will actually win a license.


1. Brisbane
BA have put their money where their mouth is towards reintroducing a team into Australia’s third-largest population centre.  They have thrown their support behind the bid to bring a team back to Brisbane and are actively trying to bring together a number of interested parties into one, focused bid group.  The appointment of former Brisbane Broncos CEO Bruno Cullen as bid chairman and ex-Queensland Olympic Council executive director Michael Brierley as the bid's full-time chief executive was designed to help unite the formerly disparate groups who had previously expressed interest in reloading the Bullets, and attract the financial backing required to bankroll an NBL team.  BA is also actively helping to lobby the corporate sector in support of this funding.  When this is eventually secured, Brisbane will once more have a team to support in the NBL. Hopefully this will be sooner rather than later.
Chances: Definite

2. Canberra
Whilst all the talk of new NBL teams has been centred on Melbourne and Brisbane, Canberra was a foundation club and three-time league champion.  Canberra also happens to be the national capital, home of federal politics (and politicians) and the eighth largest city in Australia in terms of population (420,000).  Whilst that population drops significantly when parliament isn’t sitting, it is still a city with a proud basketball heritage and sufficient potential fan base to support a team.  You also cannot underestimate the potential benefits of playing regular games in front of government politicians.  Certainly, when I suggested Canberra as a strong location for a potential NBL team on Twitter a few weeks ago, this benefit was questioned. It was pointed out that playing in Canberra hadn’t helped the Capitals and the WNBL.  Yet they play in a very different league with far less audience, and I would argue that the WNBL might not have retained its long-running ABC-TV partnership if the Caps weren’t in the league.  Do I expect to see a Canberra–based team in the NBL in the next couple of years? No. Yet I still believe it should be a priority market for the league and could be extremely successful (with the standard asterisk of having the right model in place).
Chances: Maybe

3. Melbourne 2
A second Melbourne team seemed ever so close midway through 2012.  A bid group, consisting of a good mix of business-minded corporate professionals and sharp basketball minds, had drawn up a solid business model and identified a venue to play in (the State Basketball Centre in Knox).  Ultimately the group were let down by their financial backers.  That sent them back to the drawing board, but the NBL remains committed to a second Victorian team.  The Tigers will only have a monopoly in Melbourne until suitable financial backing can be found. That being said, the move to reintroduce a second team to Melbourne must be done carefully so as not to undermine the Melbourne Tigers’ efforts.  It will also need to include a model that will allow fans of all former Victorian NBL teams to support it against the Tigers.  That’s far easier said than done. 
Chances: Definite

4. Sydney 2
There has been very little talk of a second Sydney team, yet the New South Wales is the single largest city in Australia with 4.6 million people.  Whilst the West Sydney Razorbacks never really managed to achieve the off-court success everyone hoped for, they did show just how good a cross-city rivalry could be in Sydney.  The 2004 NBL Grand Final series between the Razorbacks and Kings was an all-time classic and brought an amazing buzz to the Harbour City.  The Kings are however still re-establishing themselves in Sydney and there are many who believe that a one-team, one-city model is the best option for the NBL.  Yet there are some truly massive basketball centres in western Sydney and if a model could be established that galvanised the inherent interest in basketball in that area, a second Sydney team would certainly be of interest. 
Chances: Maybe

5. Newcastle
Called by some the spiritual home of basketball in Australia, Newcastle has had two previous NBL incarnations.  First came the Newcastle Falcons, a foundation club that folded in 1999.  Then followed the Hunter Pirates, who were in the league for three seasons from 2003 to 2006.  Hopes of the return of an NBL team to Newcastle were raised a few years ago when local mining magnate Nathan Tinkler indicated an interest in purchasing a license through his Hunter Sports Group. Those hopes have however suffered a significant blow following Tinkler’s recent well-publicised financial setbacks.  There is however strong support from the Newcastle Basketball Association for a license bid, and certainly, with a population of over half a million people, the market size should be capable of supporting a pro team.  If Tinkler can engineer a return to his high-flying fortunes, it is not outside the realms of possibility that the Falcons could fly again.
Chances: Maybe


6. Hobart
Whilst adding Brisbane would, as I said earlier, allow the NBL to move back to a truly ‘national’ competition, one state still remains unrepresented – Tasmania. Hobart (population 220,000), Devonport (85,000) and Launceston (110,000) have previously had NBL teams and Launceston actually won the NBL title in 1981.  Yet since the Hobart Devils were punted from the NBL in 1996 due to financial difficulties the Apple Isle has been without representation in the league.  There are however currently two Tasmanian teams in the SEABL – the Hobart Chargers and North West Tasmanian Thunder.  Both have had their share of success in that super-competitive league and have dedicated fan bases.  Clearly, Hobart is the largest market and there is reportedly strong local government support for an NBL license bid there.  The population of Hobart is also larger than that in both Townsville and Cairns.  Yet to be truly successful, a Tasmanian club would harness the complete support of the Apple Isle and that is difficult.  There is a strong North and South divide in Tasmania and getting one half of the state to support a team in the other is no easy task.  There is however significant interest in Tasmania in returning to the national stage in pro sports, and an NBL team would certainly be a cheaper option than an AFL franchise.  If Tasmania is to get an NBL team, it will need significant investment to be made in infrastructure first. The bid group would also need to convince BA that there was value in adding what would effectively be another regional-sized market to the league.
Chances: Maybe

7. Geelong
The Geelong Supercats prowled the NBL from 1982 to 1996 before ultimately handing back their license.  They have however since continued to compete in the SEABL very successfully and have the infrastructure in place for an NBL bid in the form of the Geelong Arena.  The city of Geelong has a population of almost 175,000 people, and already hosts a successful pro sports franchise in the Geelong Cats AFL team.  An NBL team could provide the good folks of Sleepy Hollow a Summer team to support.  Geelong’s Supercats basketball team also already has strong community and media support in place and, if they ultimately decide they do want to get back into the league, they are well placed to put forward a compelling case for inclusion. 
Chances: Maybe


8. Gold Coast
The scars from losing the second Gold Coast NBL team are still raw, but there is a reason most of Australia’s pro leagues have placed a team on the glitter strip that can’t be ignored.  It has a population of just under 515,000, making it the sixth-largest population centre in Australia and its growing fast.  There is a somewhat seasonal and transient element to that population given it’s a major tourist destination, yet it is still a very sizeable market.  Restarting an NBL franchise on the Gold Coast would take a lot of work as there were many people burnt by the Blaze.  It is highly unlikely to happen in the short term, but if the league does start to successfully expand, then there is little doubt that a strong bid from a Gold Coast based group would need to be seriously considered.
Chances: Slim


9. Darwin
The Northern Territory has hosted a number of NBL games over the years as well as a pair of pre-season tournaments yet there has been little serious talk of an NBL team there.  Its relative isolation is one factor that has dampened enthusiasm for a Darwin-based team, yet a case could be made for a Northern Territory side. There are 130,000 people in the city (only slightly less than Townsville and Cairns) and basketball is a popular sport locally.  With NBL teams as far away as Perth and Auckland already, a team in Darwin should hold little fear in terms of travel time.  The concern really lies around ensuring there is sufficient corporate support, yet it is not out of the question that the Northern Territory government could be enticed to be a naming rights sponsor.  Getting everyone in the Territory to support a team based in Darwin will be a challenge.  The Darwin v Alice Springs divide is every bit as strong as Hobart v Launceston.  Yet an NBL team would be the first major pro team in NT and it fair to expect that whoever does venture there first will foster significant good will.
Chances: Slim

Friday, 25 January 2013

Shooting for the stars but aiming for the moon


It started as a murmur and has quickly grown into a serious roar.

No, I’m not talking about the Oscar buzz around Hugh Jackman’s star turn in Les  Miserables but the campaign by the NBL Players Association  against the league’s points cap.

The NBLPA, for so long a body that had lain dormant, has taken to the media and internet of late to make numerous public statements lambasting the league’s player points system as “restraint of trade”.

The NBLPA has made it clear that the points system is a major bone of contention in the lead-up to the League’s next Collective Bargaining Agreement negotiations at the end of the current 2012/13 season.

"When the collective bargaining agreement comes up at the end of this season, we'll be seeking to have the points system abolished," NBLPA President Jacob Holmes said in an interview with PerthNow.

"We don't see the points system as agreeable as a matter of principal, or in law. It restricts the players, their movement, and restricts their trade.”

The argument around Restraint of Trade is one that rears its head regularly in discussions around salary caps in Australian sport. The NBL is however the first also to operate a Points Cap, where players are rated between one and ten points by the league and clubs given a Total Team Points limit they must also stay under.  

The NBLPA has made clear it believes that that Points Cap is a Restraint of Trade on its players and have recruited Brendan Schwab, the General Secretary of the Australian Athletes Alliance, to help make that argument.

“There can be no justification whatsoever legally to have a point system of any kind in professional team sport,” wrote Schwab in a scathing blog

Further, Schwabb went on to state that both the NBL’s Points and Salary Caps were set to go under the microscope of the courts.

“The NBL is a very stark example of a restraint that’s going to come under much greater legal scrutiny throughout Australia’s professional team sports – that is the legal enforceability of salary cap arrangements,” Schwabb wrote. “Based on a series of legal victories – going back to English footballer George Eastham’s successful restraint of trade action against Newcastle United in 1963 – a salary cap can only be justified if it goes no further than is reasonably necessary to protect the legitimate interests of the league and the clubs.”

The question of what is “reasonably necessary” to ensure the league’s and clubs’ interests are adequately looked after is the million dollar question.

Clearly the NBL and Basketball Australia believe that the continuation of the points and salary caps is absolutely necessary.

"The NBL has always worked closely with the NBL Players Association around the institution and management of the points system and we very much welcome the Association's views, however, the NBL has no plans to abolish the points system," an NBL spokesperson said in response to the NBLPA’s campaign against the caps.

"The league views the points system as an important tool in helping continue to build on the past three years of growth.

"Further, any changes to the points system would need to demonstrably improve competition within the NBL."

With both sides in seemingly firmly entrenched positions, the battlelines are drawn and it raises the spectre of a lockout-type situation or even a player strike for the first time in NBL history.

Before we jump to that sort of lose-lose scenario however, it would be wise to examine the validity or otherwise of the NBLPA’s claims.

“Our members have given unanimous support to the eradication of the points cap,” the Players Association tweeted recently. “It goes further than is reasonableness (sic) necessary. Has and is costing players jobs. We have testimony to support this which we will present to the NBL at CBA negotiations.”

So the NBLPA apparently have documented instances of players who have had their careers cut short by the points cap.  Yet a tweet from former Townsville Crocodiles CEO fairly neatly renders any such testimony as pointless.

“Interestingly the points cap has been used by clubs as the excuse (for cutting players),” Smythe tweeted.  “Easier to blame something else then (sic), we chose not to keep you.”

The NBLPA also claims the cap restricts player movement through free agency.  Yet one regular complaint from fans in recent seasons has actually been that too many players have been swapping teams in the off-season, so the argument that it stops free player movement is tenuous at best.

In fact, the NBLPA subsequently made a somewhat contradictory argument after seizing upon comments by European-based Boomers Star David Barlow.

Barlow stated that he felt the points cap was taking away “job security” for the league’s best players.

"One of the main reasons I would want to come back to Australia is for job security, but the points system takes that security away, makes players with higher ratings at risk of losing their job,” Barlow said in an interview. “Why would I want to come home to that?"

So the points cap makes it too difficult for players to move but also means they are forced to move too much apparently.

Others have already pointed out the fact that it is seldom the high points local players who feel the axe and that it is far more likely that it is Barlow’s price tag that is keeping him in Europe.

In December the NBLPA made it clear that it believes the only way forward for the league is to ensure the best players, like Barlow, are brought back to the NBL.

“To be successful the NBL will attract and retain the best talent possible,” the Players Association account tweeted. “Not possible by placing unreasonable restrictions in the way.”

To be fair however NBL teams can sign whoever they want. If they want to go after Barlow or any of his fellow European-based Australians, they can.  Clubs just have to make some tough decisions around the rest of their roster.

Yes, clubs must stay within their total team points limit. Yet if they really do want to sign a specific star player, they can.  Barlow would be a ten-point player, as would Joe Ingles, Brad Newley or even Andrew Bogut for that matter.  It is not the points system that keeps players overseas. 

It does however stop clubs from stockpiling talent and prevents the NBL from seeing the rise of “superclubs” like Manchester United in soccer, which dominate their local competitions regularly.

And that appears to be the real reason behind the NBLPA’s campaign.

The reality is that the points cap has been effective in ensuring that teams don’t completely fill their rosters with superstars. Whilst that might not sound like such a great thing, it is actually important to ensure the long-term financial survival of the clubs. 

Too many teams have shown in the past a willingness to allow their tunnel vision on the championship trophy blind them to the realities of their budgets.  

Whilst the NBLPA has said previously that the players shouldn’t have to suffer restrictions because clubs can’t control their spending, the reality is that nearly all pro leagues impose some restrictions on team spending for this very reason. 

There are also always examples of teams trying to illegally circumvent those spending restrictions in the quest for glory across all sports.  Far better resourced leagues than the NBL have suffered from salary cap rorting despite extensive auditing, so the inclusion of a points cap as an additional internal control is absolutely reasonable.

If the NBL did eliminate the points cap, it would make it far easier for clubs to cheat the salary cap. The NBL simply does not have the resources to investigate adequately the salary cap dealings of all teams in detail, let alone catch any teams arranging third-party payments outside the cap.

Basketball Australia is charged with growing the sport in this country, and it needs a vibrant and sustainable NBL to provide local playing opportunities for elite players and a pathway towards the national team.

On the other hand the NBLPA are mandated by their membership to look out first and foremost for the players’ best interests.  All too often however that translates into pushing for greater financial returns for the top 20 percent of earners rather than the minimum wage earners who could benefit the most from a salary increase.

The points cap has been in place in the NBL since 2003 and the NBLPA have actually played a role in its administration on the Points Appeals Panel.  Why the Players Association is choosing to raise the system as an issue now, almost a decade after its implementation deserves scrutiny.  The fact that they are preparing to negotiate a new Collective Bargaining Agreement with the League at the end of the current season has clearly been the trigger, but are they really expecting the NBL clubs to agree to scrap the points cap? 

Apart from being an extra safety valve to save clubs from their own darker urges to spend themselves into oblivion in pursuit of a title, the points cap plays also an important role as a way of ensuring an even spread of talent.  It has served clubs well thus far in that regard, with the race for playoff berths perennially close right through until the final weeks of the NBL season.

Would the regional teams or the clubs from smaller markets really want to remove the points cap and risk the rich getting richer to the point they simply couldn’t compete?

Of course the NBLPA says that the League has no choice but to scrap the points cap, as they maintain it is illegal. 

Prior to introducing the points cap however, Basketball Australia sought extensive legal advice on whether the system was legitimate.  That advice made it clear that, as long as the player points weren’t related either directly or indirectly to player salaries, then it would not breach the restraint of trade legislation.

Whilst you can always find a lawyer to give an opposing opinion, the fact the Players Association have never brought any sort of restraint of trade action against the NBL, nor has any player, in ten years of the system operating undermines the NBLPA’s argument. 

Ultimately, it appears that the Players Association is doing what it needs to do to present a united front and get on the front foot ahead of the looming CBA negotiations.

“Great news on NBLPA memberships, we are at over 90% of the players, highest number on record & it will be 100% at CBA time. #united” tweeted the NBLPA recently.

If that is indeed the case (and given the traditionally poor turnout from players to NBLPA meetings in the past I have my doubts) then that’s great news for the players.  They need a strong union to look out for their welfare.  All too well do I remember having to sit down with the players of the Sydney Spirit after their club went under to help sort through how we were going to get at least a portion of their money back.  These were players with wives, families and mortgages, and I don’t believe that any ever saw all of what they were legitimately owed. 

The players absolutely deserve to have their contracts honoured.  They also deserve to receive a fair share of revenue generated by their teams.  Yet NBL clubs simply are not raking in cash and the majority are accepting losses on a regular basis.  Is now therefore the time to loosen the controls on spending?

Ultimately I am not convinced that the NBLPA’s campaign is so much about abolishing the points cap as it is about negotiating an increase in the salary cap.  The position of the league and the clubs on the points system is firmly entrenched.  The salary cap however hasn’t increased for a number of years now. So a legitimate case can be made for making some sort of upwards adjustment to it to cover at least CPI increases over that time.

No matter what you believe to be the truth behind the union’s on-going campaign, the Collective Bargaining dialogue in the off-season promises to be full of more intrigue than ever before in NBL history.  Yet my sense is that this is a case of the NBLPA shooting for the stars but really aiming for the moon.